I get PMC data or something similar from Strava, intervals.icu, and others, but I rely on WKO5. I use it as the canonical source of training analysis.
Trainingpeaks wko 5 how to#
It's a bit slow and quirky and takes a hell of a lot of effort to learn how to use, but that's true of just about anything. There were some new models that made it into WKO5 that was of interest to me, so I decided to take the plunge as I didn't find the cost to be all that onerous. However, when I picked it up recently after having laid off for several years, I was surprised to see that very little work on the UI had been done. There are ways to get the PMC, the MMP, AEPF, etc. I've also used Cycling Analytics, Strava, intervals.icu and several other also-rans. In the past, I've used Golden Cheetah extensively. I've both WKO5 and Premium Training Peaks, the latter of which is mostly pointless for me outside the workout builder and the fact that it allows me to sync my files more easily to other services, including WKO5. If however you are looking for very specific charts WKO5 could be a great solution for you. If you're hoping that throwing $150 at WKO5 is just going to help you know how to train you will probably be disappointed. Other solutions like Golden Cheetah are fine too, they all have their upsides and downsides and which is best for you really depends upon how you intend to use it.
Trainingpeaks wko 5 upgrade#
I'm also pretty salty about how they pretty much forced a WKO4->WKO5 upgrade by disabling strava sync in WKO4.Īs others have mentioned intervals.icu is incredible and provides everything I used to use WKO5 for. Not a deal breaker by any stretch, but it's a model right out of the year 2000. Want to use it on a 3rd computer? You need to deactivate one of your other machines. If you want to run on more than one OS you need to buy a second license.
![trainingpeaks wko 5 trainingpeaks wko 5](https://i0.wp.com/endurance.biz/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/150724_Training-Peaks-WKO4.jpg)
It is very flexible and provides a ton of great information if you know what you are looking for.īut the UI is pretty rough, and the licencing model is antiquated. There are more ways in which I use WKO5, but this three have proved very valuable. I then did leg exercised for a couple of months, and I’m happy to report the right leg is not as “lazy” anymore, meaning my net power has increased. Being aware of this, I tested my strength on each leg doing single legs squats and lunges, and found that my right leg was weaker. In fact, I was “loosing” 45w of my left leg power in helping lift the “deadweight” of my right leg. Looking at gross power released vs gross power absorbed metrics allowed me to see that, while I was putting out similar power on both legs, the right leg was somewhat “lazy” in the up stroke. Therefore, our training zones for this zone would be vastly different. But you, as a sprinter, may have a 1,500w sprint, where I may have a 900w sprint as a time-trialist. Therefore, our training zones for Threshhold (and below, for that matter) would be the same. For example: you and I may have an FTP of 250w. To explain: setting training zones based on a percentage of FTP has the inherent flaw that it assumes the is a linear relationship between zone, when in fact it’s a curve with ever wider variations the shorter the time duration. These are the next step in the evolution of training based on FTP. This has become a fundamental reference in my workout design workflow.
![trainingpeaks wko 5 trainingpeaks wko 5](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/powerterminology1-140910170141-phpapp02/95/the-trainingpeaks-guide-to-cycling-power-terminology-15-638.jpg)
These are power range recommendations for each training zone based on your power distribution curve.
![trainingpeaks wko 5 trainingpeaks wko 5](https://www.trainingpeaks.com/images/wko5/wko5-dynamic-new-features-@1x-375.jpg)
Questions about your trainer, head unit, power meter/sensors, or trainer app should be sent to the manufacturers who will have the actual answers for you.